November 20, 2013
Katherine Morris
Department of Surgery
UNM Cancer Center
MSC07-4025
1201 Camino de Salud NE
Albuquerque, NM 87131-000
1201 Camino de Salud NE
Albuquerque, NM 87131-000
Dear Ms Morris,
It
has come to my attention that you are currently in the Morris vs. New Mexico case
alongside with Dr Mangalik in hope of receiving permission from the court to
give physicians the right to administer medicine to terminally ill patients,
also known as euthanasia. The concern that arises with this though is that if
this gets legalized by the court, it would open a door to abuse and misuse of
euthanasia by both physicians and patients. Would all the patients who receive
this treatment actually be terminally ill, mentally competent, and give proper
consent? These patients are in a vulnerable, weak state of mind which would
make it a lot easier for a physician to persuade them to receive some form of
euthanasia, as it has been done it other countries such as the Netherlands. The
problem is that euthanasia would not just be available to patients terminally ill;
it would be administered to patients who have illnesses that can be treatable
like depression. In most cases, patients are suffering from depression along
with an illness of some sort, but the fact is that depression can be healed
with the right palliative care and help with physicians. The thoughts of
suicide arise in patients from this, so treating it would alleviate the
administering of this lethal medicine all together. The healthy mindset of a
patient directly correlates with their health progression and there are plenty
of studies to confirm this. If the administering of euthanasia becomes legal,
this step would be skipped entirely and patients would have no chance to
recover from their depressive state of mind. If this case were to be approved
by the court, it would make it more convenient for individuals to commit
suicide by taking this lethal medicine administered by physicians. The picture
I am trying to get across at is that the legalization of this practice with its
motive to solely to end a patient’s life would cause a slippery slope towards
it. The consequences that can arise from this are that the wrong people could
get a hold of it. To an extent, it could encourage patients to hide symptoms,
such as depression that can be healed, so that they may be able to receive
euthanasia. Would everyone who receives euthanasia be terminally ill and have
proper consent, or would people who are looking for an easy way out of there
troubles and depression have access to it too? It seems as if euthanasia is a
easy way out for not the only the patients, but the physicians too who no
longer have the responsibility of treating terminally ill patients. I am in no
way saying your side of this court case is wrong, but if the court approves the
administering of lethal medicine to patients to end their lives, it could cause
a slippery slope into this practice and cause more harm than good.
No comments:
Post a Comment